You have3 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
You have 3 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo

‘Stop imposing such requests’: Accountants warned on repeat of lending tactic

Business

Accountants have been cautioned against providing capacity to repay statements demanded by lenders, with one professional body highlighting a return of the practice.

By Jotham Lian 7 minute read

CPA Australia has seen a spike in banks requesting accountants to sign off on a client’s loan application as a means of assessing a borrower’s ability to service a loan before approving it, potentially shifting liability onto the accountant.

Speaking to Accountants Daily, CPA Australia general manager of external policy Paul Drum said this was a cyclical issue that seems to have reappeared as lenders tighten lending standards.

“We are seeing lenders ask accountants who typically prepare a client’s tax return to sign off on the future viability of a business, which is in effect their capacity to repay a loan or even what percentage they will use a motor vehicle for business purposes in the future,” Mr Drum said.

“This is clearly outside the scope of work the accountant performs for their small business client in most circumstances. 

“Members are clearly concerned that what they are being asked to sign is beyond the scope of their engagement with their client and possibly exposes them to future action by the lender should something go wrong. We share those concerns and ask lenders to cease imposing such requests on accountants.”

Under the National Consumer Credit Protection Act, signing a capacity to repay certificate or other similar declarations could be a breach of the law unless an accountant has an Australian credit licence.

ASIC had warned of the practice over a decade ago, noting that such a declaration “shifts the risk of credit assessment from the lender to the accountant”, opening up accountants to potential legal action where the client defaults on the loan.

Mr Drum believes accountants should stay away from providing such declarations, especially where their scope of engagement does not entail such an arrangement.

“We find that members feel pressured to sign such requests from clients as otherwise they may not get the loan,” Mr Drum said.

“Some members who sign off on such requests do not typically follow the pro forma provided by the lender. Instead they use their own words to qualify what they are signing. Whether this is enough to protect an accountant if things go wrong is unknown.

“Accountants are very important to the preparation of quality financial information for small business loan applications. It is the responsibility of the lender to use that and other information to make an appropriate credit assessment, not to seek to pass that role on to the accountants.

“Such requests by lenders may be counterproductive in the long run as it runs the risk of accountants deciding that the potential consequences of preparing financial information for loan applications for a client is too high, leading to lower-quality loan applications and increased difficulty for small business to access finance.”

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!
Jotham Lian

Jotham Lian

AUTHOR

Jotham Lian is the editor of Accountants Daily, the leading source of breaking news, analysis and insight for Australian accounting professionals.

Before joining the team in 2017, Jotham wrote for a range of national mastheads including the Sydney Morning Herald, and Channel NewsAsia.

You can email Jotham at:  

You are not authorised to post comments.

Comments will undergo moderation before they get published.

Comments (7)

  • avatar
    Shouldn't this have been an issue at the royal commission. The big banks and finance companies pressuring accountants and tax agents with this. It should be illegal.
    0
    • avatar
      Agreed it should absolutely be illegal. The banks are NOT using this to assess the ability to repay. They are just trying to find someone else to blame or perhaps say to ASIC that they are responsible lenders. But since it's been legislated that accounting has nothing to do with financial advice or credit assessments it's time to stop those that can do such things asking us to do it.
      0
  • avatar
    Agree. That's why accountants should stick to what trained for and build.
    A professional mortgage broker with 10 years experience is best to assist with alternative forms of funding.
    0
  • avatar
    its not our job - dont do it. Id rather lose a client than my house.
    0
  • avatar
    Out of scope? Easy, write it into your engagement letter and then send a bill for your service which should be at a much higher charge rate than preparing a tax return.
    Credit Assessment by the accountant? We are probably the only ones that can make a proper assessment about the ability of our clients to make repayments. Only we know that there are extra costs being incurred of running a mistress or gigolo.
    0
    • avatar
      Peter, your house will be on the line first. Your higher "charge rate" (get with the times) will pale in comparison to being sued for your assets.
      0
  • avatar
    It was clearly established in case law many years ago that providing a letter of comfort to a lender will potentially shift liability back onto the accountant if the lender defaults. NEVER provide these things, no matter how much the client jumps up and down or how much pressure the bank applies.
    0