The class action, which was filed in the Victorian Supreme Court, is brought on behalf of shareholders who acquired securities in Freedom Foods Group between 7 December 2014 and 24 June 2020.
The class action alleges shareholders suffered losses following the company’s recent ASX announcements relating to material write-downs in asset valuations and restatements of prior year financial results.
“The class action alleges that Freedom Foods contravened its continuous disclosure obligations by failing to keep the market informed of price-sensitive information relevant to its FY20 and historic financial performance, and further that it made statements to the market which were misleading or deceptive,” Slater and Gordon practice group leader Emma Pelka-Caven said.
The class action also alleges that auditor Deloitte engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct in making statements regarding the financial accounts of Freedom Foods throughout the claim period. Deloitte had also identified significant irregularities in the company’s accounts going back a number of years as part of the 2020 financial report issued on 30 November.
On 30 November, Freedom Foods revealed more than $590 million in write-downs and the company had restated several years’ worth of accounts.
Freedom Foods is also currently being investigated by the corporate regulator ASIC for a series of “significant” accounting problems.
It is alleged Deloitte had devised an auditing strategy that treated substantial expenditures incurred by Freedom Foods as capital assets, enabling the cereal maker to report steadily growing profits instead of huge losses.
In a number of announcements after the ASX had closed on Monday, the company revealed that its past financial results were inaccurate, among other revelations.
Freedom Foods reported, in October last year, that it earned a full-year profit of $11.6 million. But that figure has now been “restated” as a $145.8 million loss.
The cereal business also confessed its losses had since widened to $174.5 million in the last financial year.
The class action has been commenced on a no win, no fee basis and group members will not be exposed to any out-of-pocket costs as a result of their participation in the claim. Slater and Gordon will also intend to apply, at the appropriate time, for a group costs order.
Piper Alderman has also stated in early December it is talking to litigation funders and investigating a potential shareholder class action against the company and its auditors.
You are not authorised to post comments.
Comments will undergo moderation before they get published.