Login
iscover
With the accountants’ exemption set to end in less than a year, the Financial Ombudsman Service body has issued its predictions regarding the presence of accountants in future cases of external dispute resolution regarding SMSF advice.
Newsletter
FOS expects low accountant dispute numbers
03 September 2015
•
9 minute read
You’re out of free articles for this month
To continue reading the rest of this article, please log in.
Create free account to get unlimited news articles and more!
Alison Maynard, ombudsman, FOS Australia, said accountants do not want to spend their time dealing with disputes over potential SMSF issues and will try to resolve issues at an early stage.
“My expectation with accountants is that there will be a very low number of disputes coming to FOS,” she noted.
Ms Maynard compared accountants to stockbrokers, a profession that has also seen minimal dispute cases in dealing with the Ombudsman.
“That’s what a professional does. Try to resolve issues. If a client has issues, they want them sorted, and they want to retain the client,” she added.
Ms Maynard indicated that while the Ombudsman had yet to decide on any cases that deal with best interests duty, the onus would likely be placed on the accountant to show that “safe harbour steps” had been undertaken.
In an attempt to ensure that dispute numbers stay at a minimum, Ms Maynard and the FOS also outlined key advice features that aim to assist accountants in providing quality advice when recommending an SMSF product to a prospective client.
==
==
Clearly defining a scope of advice, as well as setting prioritised, specific and measurable goals were, according to Ms Maynard, vital to ensuring that quality advice is delivered.
Ms Maynard concluded by stressing that the existing insurance situation of the client must be taken into account, as a failure to do so has been a prevalent issue in FOS dealings in recent times.
You are not authorised to post comments.
Comments will undergo moderation before they get published.