Login
iscover
Directors will soon have to apply for a permanent unique identification number or risk hefty fines, following the passage of new legislation.
Directors set for permanent identifier under new laws
18 June 2020
•
7 minute read
Treasury Laws Amendment (Registries Modernisation and Other Measures) Bill 2019 has now been passed, giving effect to a new Director Identification Number (DIN) regime.
You’re out of free articles for this month
To continue reading the rest of this article, please log in.
Create free account to get unlimited news articles and more!
The DIN will require all existing and new directors to confirm their identity to a unique identifier that will be kept permanently, even if they cease to be a director.
The unique identifier will provide traceability of a director’s relationships across companies, enabling better tracking of directors of failed companies and will prevent the use of fictitious identities, such as Elvis Presley or Bob Marley.
The new law will also combat phoenix activity, as well reduce time and cost for administrators and liquidators during the insolvency process by providing a more streamlined tracking of directors and their corporate history.
BDO business services partner Brendan Balasekeran said the new DIN regime would be akin to a driver’s licence number and allow regulators to minimise illegal or fraudulent behaviour by directors.
“Consider the ATO’s published data on phoenix activity and some nefarious operators signing up innocent people as directors, this change seems like a prudent decision to help the regulator keep directors accountable,” Mr Balasekeran said.
Under the new requirements, new directors will have to apply for a DIN before they are appointed as a director, unless the period is extended by the regulations or unless they are provided an exemption or extension by the registrar.
A transitional period for existing directors will be specified by a legislative instrument made by the minister.
Those appointed as a director within the first 12 months of the new regime’s operation will also be granted an additional 28 days to apply for a DIN.
There will be civil and criminal penalties for directors that fail to apply for a DIN within the applicable time frame, and for conduct that undermines the new requirements, including providing false identity information to the registrar or intentionally applying for multiple DINs.
Despite the passage of the bill, ASIC has previously warned that it may take up to two years to set up a new system.
“We want to build the Director Identification Number system onto the new platform, not old technology that’s more than 30 years old,” ASIC executive director Warren Day told a parliamentary committee earlier this year.
“We understand that haste from a number of industry bodies and government parties that it be done now or yesterday.
“We don’t want to rush it; we want to make sure that it is built on the new technology platform.”
The Treasury expects the new DIN regime will increase compliance costs on directors by approximately $21.5 million per year on average over 10 years.
It expects most of the regulatory burden will occur in the first 18 months as existing directors fulfil their obligation under this measure to obtain a DIN.
New modern registry
The bill will also put in place a modern government registry regime that will unify the Australian Business Register (ABR) and 31 existing registers administered by ASIC.
The unified Commonwealth business registers will be operated by the Australian Business Register at the ATO.
It aims to make it easier for businesses to meet their registration obligations, make business information more trusted and valuable, and improve the efficiency of registry service transactions.
The ATO will work alongside the Treasury; ASIC; the Department of Industry, Innovation and Science; and the Digital Transformation Agency to deliver the Modernising Business Registers program.
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!
- I am glad the ATO has the overall running of this - it now has a chance of working.
The more important issue is: When will the form be released? Tax season is a few weeks away, most tax agents will see their clients within 6 months from now. If I know the layout of the form, I can make sure my clients can complete the DID registration with relative ease. I really dislike getting a long way through a form only to discover that some really obscure detail is wanted. Having a data input sheet before sitting at the terminal can make life much easier...0 - Why not just use their TFN ? It is a unique number.0
- because this number will be on a lot of publicly available documents - no one wants their TFN made public0
- This was Labor policy (we thought) but shows it was always ASIC & bureaucrat policy all along. Who really runs the country? More work for the public service with again more compliance cost to small business with Zero benefit0
- Pathetic ASIC in charge of this. They will stuff up the entire process then charge penalties to industry. Oh to be a monopoly.0
- Given my experiences with ASIC and their inability to maintain their current database, this is just an accident waiting to happen.
I have had ASIC unilaterally change part of a person's name and change the address of others (including my own!) to addresses that don't even exist.
In my experience, ASIC is by far the most incompetent government entity/department that I have to deal with.0 - What a joke, Should use tax file numbers, TFN is ID for every one0
- Let me guess. There will also be fees and industry funding levies and eventually ASIC will take over the entire world!0
- What a joke. Big brother and more compliance costs which will produce very little if any benefits. This country is becoming more and more communist by the day. A Liberal government should reduce red tape and increase our freedoms not reduce our freedoms.0
- Or passports, or have a single national ID card for everyone?
Who will exactly benefit from this special process?
Given a terrorist is released and allowed to cause a siege in Martin Place, what exactly is ASIC or the ATO going to do to stop these sophisticated criminals.0 - Why not just use tax file numbers?0
- Not sure you want your TFN out there on the inter webs if the data is available to the public (not sure if it will be but I would make the assumption that’s why)0
- Probably because this register will be public and TFN's are meant to be private0
- Exactly ! and no they don't need to be made public! Only ASIC needs to know your TFN, if Bob Marley or Elvis Presley want to become directors then they need to supply a TFN to ASIC and if it isn't already this should then be match up to ATO and that person's tax debts and compliance history!! FFS we don't need MORE regulation!!!0
