You have 0 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
accountants daily logo

Accounting bodies oppose increase to bankruptcy threshold

Regulation

A rise in the default figure to $20,000 will fail to alleviate cost-of-living pressures, say CPA Australia and CA ANZ.

By Miranda Brownlee 11 minute read

CPA Australia and CA ANZ have both opposed an increase in the default bankruptcy threshold from $10,000 to $20,000 in responses to the Attorney-General’s personal insolvency discussion paper.

In its submission, CPA Australia said the proposal would fail to alleviate cost-of-living pressures.

“For many, mortgage stress is their leading financial concern. The amount of such debt is generally significantly higher than the proposed bankruptcy threshold,” the submission said.

“While cost-of-living pressures are front-of-mind for many Australians, we are not seeing any data suggesting a surge in personal insolvencies. The recent increase in bankruptcies shows them returning to their pre-Covid long-term average. We don’t expect that number to materially go above that average.”

The accounting body also raised concerns that increasing the default bankruptcy threshold could impact lending confidence, especially for small businesses selling on credit.

“It should also be noted that reducing the rights of businesses, particularly smaller businesses to recover debts may transfer financial stress onto them,” the submission stated.

==
==

“Debts of up to $20,000 or $50,000 are not small for many small businesses. Increased difficulties collecting such debt may in turn place them in financial difficulty.”

In its submission, CA ANZ said an increase in the bankruptcy threshold would delay the ability of creditors to recover lost revenue, which was already an issue for small businesses.

The accounting body acknowledged the concerns of financial counsellors that a debt near the threshold could quickly exceed the threshold where interest or penalties applied.

“We would suggest that the primary concern is not the threshold itself but that people who are unable to pay their debts rarely seek help until they receive a bankruptcy notice, which can only be issued once a threshold is breached,” it said.

“Therefore, we submit that for people who will not or cannot address mounting debt until a third party intervenes, an increase in the threshold would only result in an increase in the debt incurred before seeking help.”

CPA Australia said the best way to assist people experiencing financial distress was to encourage them to seek advice early from regulated advisers.

“In our opinion, the key issue that the current economic circumstances raise is the unwillingness of many people in financial distress to seek advice early from regulated advisers. This is predominately because of the stigma associated to bankruptcy,” the submission said.

“This unfortunately increases the probability of a person being placed into bankruptcy. Lifting the bankruptcy threshold does not address this fundamental issue.”

Raising the threshold may also have the unintended consequence of encouraging some people with smaller debts to further delay action, it said.

You are not authorised to post comments.

Comments will undergo moderation before they get published.

accountants daily logo Newsletter

Receive breaking news directly to your inbox each day.

SUBSCRIBE NOW