Login
iscover
There is a mounting lobby against an 18-fold increase in fees for SMSF auditors and the proposed three-year audit cycle, as professional associations find members considering to ditch their registration.
‘Punitive cost regime’ triggers auditor exodus fears
08 June 2018
•
4 minute read
var tags = '';
The draft legislation for the proposed fee-for-service model for ASIC also requires SMSF auditors to pay a deregistration fee of $899 to exit the sector. However, if auditors are disqualified, there is no cost applied.
The new fees are separate from the $259 paid by each SMSF to the ATO to finance the monitoring role that the tax office conducts on behalf of ASIC.
“It’s ironic on one hand we have a banking royal commission that is not showering the larger superannuation sector or the banks or the wealth management sector in glory, and for reasons such as that, there could be a spike in the demand for SMSFs, and yet at the same time there is now a new punitive cost regime being brought in for SMSF auditors,” Mr Drum said.
“It raises the broader question of whether you can get an SMSF auditor in the future, particularly in rural, regional Australia, and questions about the future of the profession because SMSF auditors are one element of the future of the accounting profession.”
Three-year audit cycle
Mr Drum also pointed to the federal budget’s announcement to increase the audit cycle to three years for funds with clean track records as another measure that might unfairly target SMSF auditors and has questioned the rationale behind it.
“In a way, it’s a whole lot of things coming home to roost at once. I don’t think it is necessarily by design; it’s because of agencies operating in isolation and not looking at a holistic picture,” Mr Drum said.
“Given that SMSFs are effectively regulated by the ATO, CPA Australia would like to know whether the ATO was consulted on the three-year audit announcement and what it would potentially mean.”
While CPA would continue to lobby against the proposals, Mr Drum cautioned against expecting any quick fixes.
“It’s not over yet. It is something we will be making ongoing representations on and I don’t think it’s over or cast in stone,” Mr Drum said.
“The path to getting something changed takes a while and there’s collateral damage along the way as people lose interest and get disengaged.”
You’re out of free articles for this month
To continue reading the rest of this article, please log in.
Create free account to get unlimited news articles and more!
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!
