Login
iscover
Treasurer Joe Hockey’s suggestion to allow Australians to use their superannuation savings throughout their lives to fund purchases such as property has been slammed by members of the superannuation industry.
Newsletter
Industry hits back at Hockey's suggestion for super
10 March 2015
•
10 minute read
You’re out of free articles for this month
To continue reading the rest of this article, please log in.
Create free account to get unlimited news articles and more!
Following the release of the Abbott government’s Intergenerational Report, which predicts that by 2055, Australia will have almost nine times the number of 100-year-olds it does today, Mr Hockey said Australians should be thinking differently about the role of super as the population ages.
"I get a lot of people approaching me saying that young people should be able to use their superannuation to fund a deposit on a home – on their first home," Mr Hockey said, according to Fairfax reports.
"I am concerned about rising house prices and the accessibility to homes and homeownership for younger Australians, but we've got a limited pool of savings. We need to have these conversations."
However, the superannuation industry has slammed Mr Hockey’s most recent suggestions, with The SMSF Association’s director of technical and professional standards, Graeme Colley, struggling to find any merit in the proposal.
“You have to look at some of the subsidies that come out of government through first home owners’ grants, stamp duty concessions and so forth,” Mr Colley told AccountantsDaily's sister publication SMSF Adviser.
“It means that people either buy more expensive houses or the price of the house increases and those subsidies are virtually neutral.”
==
==
Mr Colley also questioned whether investors under 30 would have substantially enough superannuation savings to fund a home deposit, particularly in capital cities such as Sydney.
Expenses that are ordinarily linked to working life, such as housing, should also be kept separate from retirement income policy, Mr Colley said.
Quantum Financial principal and independent financial adviser Tim Mackay is also firmly opposed to the treasurer’s suggestion.
“Pumping another source of funds into an already overheated property market only benefits those selling properties,” Mr Mackay said.
“How on earth will [the] resulting increased house prices benefit younger people? Politicians sharing their thought bubbles in super does nothing for consumers’ confidence in the super system.”
There are also potential equity issues with this proposal, according to Pauline Vamos, chief executive of the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia.
"If people take money out of their super, it's likely at some point they will replace it through salary sacrifice, make additional contributions and receive a substantial tax concession for this,” Ms Vamos said.
“This 'double-dip' into the tax concession pot is likely to be highly skewed towards high-income earners, who are more likely to have the additional income available to do this," she said.
You are not authorised to post comments.
Comments will undergo moderation before they get published.