Login
iscover
Fringe benefits tax has once again been cast into the heap of taxes requiring reform, as it fails the “rule of simplicity” in the tax system, says one practitioner.
Newsletter
FBT flagged as a ‘strong’ case for reform
23 April 2018
•
7 minute read
With the FBT lodgement period underway, the ATO has released guidance and reminders on “simple mistakes” that could trigger red flags in its systems, including common errors such as failing to report an employee’s private use of a company car.
You’re out of free articles for this month
To continue reading the rest of this article, please log in.
Create free account to get unlimited news articles and more!
Several mid-tier firms have also spoken out on certain issues that might attract the attention of the tax office, as well as new considerations for this lodgement year.
Numbers Partnership consultant Greg Hollands believes it is time to scrape FBT altogether, considering how complex it has gotten.
“However complicated you thought the original structure of FBT to be, including the complex rules of valuation and record keeping, it paled into insignificance when the changes were made to ‘gross up’ benefit payments and then such a gross up had to include the impact of GST in later years,” said Mr Hollands.
“Another fundamental rule that it fails is that of the person who gains the benefit should pay the tax.
“Sure, there is a recapture system in place in many situations, purely voluntary of course, but it also strikes me as strange that the actual net tax recapture from the employee is employer status dependent, that is, non-profits have an advantage over a standard commercial taxpayer.”
==
==
Instead, Mr Hollands believes there is a case for the benefit to be taxed at an employee’s personal rate.
“I wonder if it would be a lot simpler to just create a set of rules which included an amount of benefit in the assessable income of the actual employee who received the benefit,” said Mr Hollands.
“The benefit is taxed at the employee’s personal rate and is directly paid by them at their marginal rate of tax through regular PAYG deductions. It would then be the employee who has the record keeping obligations.
“The result would, in my opinion, be fairer, and at least not offend some of the fundamentals of tax system design.”
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!
