Login
iscover
The tax office has stated it is actively reviewing certain arrangements used by certain taxpayers to ensure they pay the right amount of tax on income they earn in Australia.
Newsletter
ATO warns against profit shifting
27 April 2016
•
10 minute read
You’re out of free articles for this month
To continue reading the rest of this article, please log in.
Create free account to get unlimited news articles and more!
Jeremy Hirschhorn, deputy commissioner, public groups, said the ATO has released a series of taxpayer alerts as an early warning to taxpayers and their advisers about emerging profit-shifting arrangements that may lead to tax avoidance.
“Taxpayer alerts set out our concerns on emerging practices,” Mr Hirschhorn said.
“They are an effective tool to stop the marketing, sale and implementation of schemes, support voluntary disclosures from those who may be involved in these schemes, and enhance community confidence in the integrity of our tax system,” he added.
“While the majority of large corporates pay the right amount of tax in Australia and are open and transparent in their dealings with us, we are concerned some arrangements may not meet the laws as intended.”
“Today we have released four taxpayer alerts on particular areas of concern,” Mr Hirschhorn said.
A taxpayer alert on the Multinational Anti-Avoidance Legislation (MAAL) cautions companies and their intermediaries about implementing arrangements to avoid the MAAL, which took effect on 1 January.
==
==
Mr Hirschhorn said a further three taxpayer alerts relate to profit-shifting risks including:
- artificial related-party finance using foreign currency loans and derivatives;
- inappropriate recognition and valuation of intangible assets for thin capitalisation purposes;
- cross-border leasing arrangements involving mobile assets.
Speaking about the MAAL alert, deputy commissioner, international, Mark Konza said the MAAL was designed to counter the erosion of the Australian tax base by multinational entities using artificial and contrived arrangements to avoid attributing profits to a permanent establishment in Australia.
“Our view is that interim arrangements must reflect the economic and commercial reality of operating in Australia and we continue to engage with taxpayers and review these interim arrangements to ensure they do not themselves amount to tax avoidance schemes,” Mr Konza said.
You are not authorised to post comments.
Comments will undergo moderation before they get published.