You’re out of free articles for this month
To continue reading the rest of this article, please log in.
Create free account to get unlimited news articles and more!
KPMG Australia chairman Peter Nash said there is common agreement between both major parties that corporate tax cuts for small-to-medium enterprises are a positive step, so reforms in this area are achievable.
However, Mr Nash said that for this to happen there would need to be negotiations between the two parties on how they define small business.
“Labor defines small business as $2 million and under, which is almost irrelevant, because $2 million is not small business, it is micro-business,” he said.
Labor will need to increase its threshold, he said, while the Liberal Party will need to reduce its definition.
“Big business won’t like that, but if we’re in an environment where we’re looking for compromise maybe that’s one thing were they can find that common ground.”
KPMG tax partner Grant Wardell Johnson said there may also be other methods for reducing the effective company tax rate, such as investment allowances.
“I know there’s one major think tank that has advocated [investment allowances] recently. That could have a similar effect but be more attractive to some of the other parties,” he said.
Miranda Brownlee
AUTHOR
Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.
Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates.
Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.
You are not authorised to post comments.
Comments will undergo moderation before they get published.