Login
iscover
This financial year, the ATO will be upping its focus on auditors who excessively rely on automation to sign off on SMSF audits.
Reliance on automated audits raises red flag at ATO
20 September 2016
•
5 minute read
You’re out of free articles for this month
To continue reading the rest of this article, please log in.
Create free account to get unlimited news articles and more!
The quality of SMSF audits has long been on the ATO’s radar, but as deputy commissioner Kasey Macfarlane signalled at yesterday’s Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand National SMSF Conference, the regulator will be ramping up its surveillance of auditors who are potentially not using their professional judgement with their SMSF clients.
“What would concern us is if we see SMSF auditors not necessarily providing their skill and judgement - just relying on the automated process to do the finance checks, and then not actually turning their mind to the regulatory issues,” Ms Macfarlane said.
The ATO will also be upping its surveillance of cheap SMSF audits, although Ms Macfarlane recognised that a low price point is not universally indicative of a poor-quality SMSF audit.
“There can be lots of different things at play. There’s competitive market pressures, there’s automated processes, there’s offshoring, economies of scale, which can all lead to reduced prices in the SMSF audit space. And sometimes auditors might advertise a low fee, but really there’s a sliding scale of fees as the audit gets more complex,” Ms Macfarlane said.
SMSF auditors that promise a guaranteed low fixed fee, regardless of the complexity of the fund, particularly when coupled with a guaranteed short turnaround time, raise questions with the ATO, she said.
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!
